Date: March 2026
Project: 2 x 3-bedroom detached houses
Initial requirements
The developer submitted drawings for a quotation for timber frames for two new houses. At the time of quoting, we were unaware of the intention to install MVHR. We therefore quoted for closed panels using an average £/m2 rate for 253mm Posi-joists.
Following discussions, we became aware that the initial SAP assessor had introduced MVHR as a quick and easy way of gaining SAP compliance. This meant the building contractor would have added unnecessary costs, time and complicated airtightness detailing that we felt could be avoided. We offered to undertake the SAP calculations at zero cost.
This led to the elimination of the need for MVHR pozi joists and complicated airtightness detailing and testing, resulting in significant savings.
Summary of outcome
Upon completing SAP calculations, the quotation was changed to use enhanced wall panels – Open (Insulated) panel instead of a Closed Panel to achieve a U-value of 0.13. The developer to site fit 25mm PIR.
Without MVHR with site-fitted insulation/VCL and battens
- There is no longer a need for pozi joists, saving £1,100/house = £2,200
- Switching to an Open (insulated with 120mm PIR) panel = Saving of £8,024
- Add on-site installed 25mm PIR/VCL and battens, £1,200/house = £2,400
- Remove MVHR* @ £4,000/house = £8,000
TOTAL build costs savings – £18,224
*MVHR cost for this project. Typical conservative costs of £4,000 for a single house.